spacer
Blog

Teamsters: Taking on freedom of speech around the world
Argentina has faced a lot of adversity in the last decade, not the least of which was the Kirchner Administration’s (and the legislature’s) recent attack on free speech and the press, as reported in the Wall Street Journal.   It doesn’t help that the Teamsters locals are cutting off paper distribution, to force unionization under the [more...]

Posted Thu, 05 Nov 2009 .

Retirement: Sexual harrassment by any other name
One of 24 international vice presidents of the Teamsters, James Santangelo, has resigned his multiple posts within the Teamsters union. He was the president of Teamsters Joint Council 42 which represented 129,000 members in California, Hawaii, and elsewhere. He also led Local 848.  While the Teamsters maintain they didn’t force him out, you wonder why they [more...]

Posted Thu, 05 Nov 2009 .

 Read more at LaborPains.org

No Reason For Elections?

Male, Pale & Stale
enlarge download .pdf
After pressuring members of the House of Representatives to pass the comically misnamed “Employee Free Choice Act” in March 2007, union officials continued their drive to rewrite organizing rules by raising the issue in the Senate in June.

Labor leaders hope to dramatically change the way working Americans join unions — by stealing every employee’s right to a personal, private vote. Why would union bosses do this? Because they need to rebuild their shrinking membership, and it’s easier to coerce and cajole employees under the “card check” method, which is like an open petition. This is a process rife with intimidation, coercion, and confusion because everyone knows each employee’s preference and because there is often no opportunity given to tell the side of the story union bosses don’t want exposed.

Bruce Raynor, a top union president, claims: “There’s no need to subject the workers to an election.” It would be better to listen to the words of the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, which said “workers sometimes sign union authorization cards not because they intend to vote for the union in the election but to avoid offending the person who asks them to sign, often a fellow worker, or simply to get the person off their back.”



Click to view Click to view Click to view
Click to view Click to view Click to view
Click to view Click to view Click to view