spacer
Blog

Union backing in Arkansas a touchy subject
Arkansas’ Senate seat is just one battle ground against moderate Democrats who have not lived up to Big Labor’s EFCA expectations. Lt. Gov. Bill Halter released a press statement detailing more than $500,000 in campaign contributions by labor groups to Blanche Lincoln. The same release calls Blanche’s accusations that Halter’s debt has been paid off to [more...]

Posted Mon, 15 Mar 2010 .

Prison Guards in Pennsylvania vote against unionizing
Pennsylvania is such a union stronghold, it naturally caught my eye when Chester County guards voted down the union by a wide margin. The “Chester County Corrections Officers Independent Union” would have been associated with the Teamsters Local 312, who was “ecstatic” and “anxious” at the prospect of the guards forming a union.  From The [more...]

Posted Fri, 12 Mar 2010 .

 Read more at LaborPains.org

How Are Union Officials Shredding Democracy?

Male, Pale & Stale
enlarge download .pdf
Thousands of organizers from Change To Win labor unions have gathered in Las Vegas this year to plot ways of trashing traditional secret ballot organizing elections. A new poll shows that more than two-thirds of Americans disapprove of the Change To Win leaders' preferred "card check" campaigns, which deny a fair vote to employees. Only a scant 11 percent supported the union officials.

Card checks are just one element of a two-part strategy that union officials use to avoid fair elections. First, union officials force employers (through boycotts, pickets, and demonizing a company's brand through expensive public relations campaigns) to accept “neutrality” agreements. Under this agreement, the business gives up its right to ask for a secret ballot election and recognizs a union if enough employees sign cards. The union then moves on to the second part of its strategy, in which it seeks employee signatures on cards. But as they collect these signatures, union organizers too often harass and intimidate employees, who lose their right to a personal, private vote because of the previously agreed-to "neutrality agreement" their employer was harassed into signing. Between neutrality agreements and card checks, workplace democracy is shredded faster than you can say "anti-democratic union chiefs."

As we showed in another full-page ad, Change To Win leader and UNITE HERE president Bruce Raynor told the New York Times in May 2003 that "There's no reason to subject the workers to an election." In fact, Raynor is a leader in the effort to avoid traditional secret ballot elections, which offer every employee a personal, confidential vote. The Bureau of National Affairs recently reported that Raynor said his union organized 90 percent of its new members in 2005 through "alternative means" that often bypass traditional elections.

To learn more about union-favored anti-democratic "card check" campaigns which deny employees a fair and secret ballot, click here. To learn more about employees' rights and frequently asked questions, click here.


Click to view Click to view Click to view
Click to view Click to view Click to view
Click to view Click to view Click to view